Legal Opinion

Pifferini v. City of Eureka

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 4, 2025No. 1:24-cv-09191Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 KELLY SHANE PIFFERINI, Case No. 24-cv-09191-RMI 9 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS 10 v. Re: Dkt. No. 16 11 CITY OF EUREKA, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Now pending before the court is the motion (Dkt. 16) of Defendants City of Eureka, Brian 14 Stevens, Victoria Graham, and Jon Omey1 to dismiss Plaintiff Kelly Shane Pifferini’s complaint 15 (dkt. 1), and for clarification. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local 16 Rule 7-1(b), the court finds the matter suitable for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API