Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1935No. Appeal, 261PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The plaintiff brought this action in trespass under the federal Employers’ Liability Act to recover damages for injuries received by him. The sole allegation of negligence, as to which proofs were offered on the trial of the cause, was that the injury was due to the failure of the defendant to furnish a sufficient number of men to perform an assigned task with safety to the plaintiff. A jury returned a verdict for plaintiff and thereafter judgment n. o. v. was entered for the defendant by the court below. Plaintiff has appealed to this court, complaining of the entry of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Hoag v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  5. Lake v. Shenango Furnace Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Staub v. Toy Factory, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API