Legal Opinion

Kokotis v. DeMarco

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 2, 1996No. 95-2156PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

679 So.2d 296 (1996)

William KOKOTIS and Antonia Despina Kokotis, Appellants,

v.

Frank J. DeMARCO, Appellee.

No. 95-2156.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 2, 1996.

Sharon Lee Stedman of Sharon Lee Stedman, P.A., Orlando, for Appellants.

Benjamin Y. Saxon and Raymonda A. Chakhtoura of Benjamin Y. Saxon, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellee.

HARRIS, Judge.

In this case, we are faced with an issue similar to, albeit separate from, that considered by the supreme court in Hannah v. Newkirk, 675 So.2d 112 (1996). The question before us is whether PIP benefits payable upon future claims…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hannah v. NewkirkSupreme Court of Florida · 1996

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rollins v. PizzarelliSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. RudnickSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. McKenna v. CarlsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Pizzarelli v. RollinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Allstate Ins. Co. v. RudnickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API