Legal Opinion

Hannah v. Newkirk

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 6, 1996No. 85946PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

675 So.2d 112 (1996)

Jeffrey L. HANNAH, Petitioner,

v.

Veronica NEWKIRK, Respondent.

No. 85946.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 6, 1996.

W. George Allen and Virginia D. Stow of the Law Offices of W. George Allen, Fort Lauderdale, for Petitioner.

James T. Sparkman and John W. Reis of Sparkman, Robb, Nelson & Mason, Miami, for Respondent.

HARDING, Justice.

We have for review Newkirk v. Hannah, 655 So.2d 241 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified the following question as being one of great public importance:

DOES SECTION 627.739(1), FLORIDA STATUTES, MANDATE THAT A…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. TGI Friday's, Inc. v. DvorakSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Carson v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. Chapman v. DillonSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  4. Mansfield v. RiveroSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Rivero v. MansfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. MGR EQUIP. v. Wilson Ice EnterprisesSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Kokotis v. DeMarcoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. McKenna v. CarlsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Abbott & Purdy Group Inc. v. BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Miami-Dade County v. FerrerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API