Legal Opinion
Williams v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 27, 2016No. 07-56127PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dissent by Judge REINHARDT
ORDER
The unopposed motion for leave to file an amicus brief is GRANTED. With this amendment the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The conclusion of Judge Reinhardt’s dissenting opinion is amended as follows:
Op. at 1013, line 6: Add < As recently as this August, the California Supreme Court unanimously reversed a trial judge who dismissed a holdout juror on the dubious theory that he “failed to deliberate.” People v. Armstrong, 1 Cal.5th 432, 205 Cal.Rptr.3d 518, 533-34, 376 P.3d 640, 653-54 (2016). In fact, > immediately…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Melvin Wofford v. Jeffrey WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Tracey Brown v. Attorney General for the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- (HC) DeAnda v. KoenigDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (HC) Gonzalez v. SextonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Abraham v. BlackDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.