Legal Opinion
Gary Dwayne Bruce v. Cal Terhune California Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 19, 2004No. 02-16992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
376 F.3d 950
Gary Dwayne BRUCE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Cal TERHUNE; California Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 02-16992.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted December 4, 2003.
Filed July 19, 2004.
Quin Denvir, Federal Defender, and Ann C. McClintock (argued), Assistant Federal Defender, Sacramento, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Jo Graves, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Erik R. Brunkal, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Michael A.…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence.
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- (HC) Anthony L. Zeigler v. FoxDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (HC) Floyd v. FoxDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (HC) Johnson v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (HC) Rodriguez v. LizzaragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (HC) Torres v. LozanoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020