Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Ecolab, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 2016No. 50,358-WCAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

|,In this workers’ compensation case, the employer, Ecolab, Inc., denied a portion of the claimant’s requested medical treat*493ment. Subsequently, the medical director of the Worker’s Compensation Administration denied the claimant’s disputed request for medical treatment. Thereafter, the worker’s compensation judge (“WCJ”) reversed the decision of the medical director and ordered the employer to cover the cost of the recommended surgery. The WCJ also assessed penalties in the amount of $2,000 and attorney fees in the amount of $4,000. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the WCJ…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  3. Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & GraniteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  5. Gilliam v. Brooks Heating & Air ConditioningLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bradley v. St. Francis Med. Ctr.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Daniels v. State Through Department of Transportation and DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Daniels v. State Through Department of Transportation and DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Robert Daniels v. The State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Transportation and DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API