Legal Opinion

Marin v. Bahr

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 10, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00336Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MEL MARIN, Case No.: 23-cv-336-RSH-BLM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 14 DANIEL MARSHALL, FOR RECONSIDERATION, AND 15 Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE 16 [ECF Nos. 87, 88, 89] 17 18 19 Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Daniel 20 Marshall [ECF No. 87] and a motion for reconsideration and motion in limine brought by 21 Plaintiff Mel Marin [ECF Nos. 88, 89]. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court 22…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API