Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cadichon v. Facelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 18, 2010Published

1Dissent

Saxe and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ., dissent in a memorandum by Manzanet-Daniels, J., as follows:

I respectfully dissent. Plaintiffs demonstrated a reasonable excuse for their failure to comply with the court-issued 90-day demand, as well as a meritorious cause of action.

The record shows that the discovery delays in this consolidated action were occasioned principally by defendants. At the time the court sua sponte dismissed the action for failure to prosecute, the depositions of Dr. May and Dr. Facelle had yet to take place, and defendants had yet to designate a physician to perform an independent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. BauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Werner v. Tiffany & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Palermo v. Lord & Taylor, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Donegan v. St. Joseph's Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API