United States v. Kolly
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SEFTON, Senior Judge:
We have examined the record of trial, the assignments of error,1 and the Government’s response. We conclude that the findings and the sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed. See Art. 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a) and 866(c)(1994) [hereinafter UCMJ].
*796Consistent with his pleas before a military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial, appellant was convicted of committing several child-pornography offenses. The convening authority…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. Andrew M. Harvey, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Charles James ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. GladueUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. PullenUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. MartensUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- States v. LynnNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. NelsonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. CreamNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- United States v. MartinelliCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.