Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided May 10, 2007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*340OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.

Because this court concludes that an initial adjournment for suppression hearings is generally excludable for purposes of statutory speedy trial, defendant’s motion to dismiss must be denied.1

When, as here, a defendant is accused of a misdemeanor punishable by a sentence of more than three months in jail, the People must be ready for trial within 90 days of the commencement of the criminal action (see CPL 30.30 [1] [b]), minus any excludable periods (see CPL 30.30 [4]; People v Cortes, 80 NY2d 201, 208 [1992]). The parties do not dispute that 61…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
  2. People v. Asmal-AucapinaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
  3. People v. JaouiCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2016
  4. People v. E.C.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 2009
  5. People v. JosephCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API