Weitling v. Sorenson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
Separate actions were instituted to recover from the defendant Sorenson as sole surviving partner of the firm of Crossman & Sielcken, in liquidation, a balance of $72,761.89, alleged to be due to each of the plaintiffs under a written contract whereby the plaintiffs were employed as export managers. Thereafter the defendant Irving Trust Company, as executor of the estate of Herman Sielcken, who had died on October 8, 1917, was impleaded as a defendant and was served with a supplemental summons and complaint. By an order entered October 15, 1931, the four actions were consolidated and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carthage Tissue Paper Mills v. Village of CarthageNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Bank of Montreal v. . RecknagelNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Mitchell v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Stiebel v. . GrosbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Pitt v. . Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adams v. JudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Weitling v. SorensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938