Legal Opinion

Weitling v. Sorenson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 1938Published

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment rendered against him in favor of defendants after a trial before the court and a jury. _

_ Weitling was employed as one of four export managers by the firm of Crossman & Sielcken under a written contract which entitled him to receive ten per cent of the profits of the concern beginning with the year 1914. He brought this action to recover from defendant Sorenson, as the surviving partner of the firm of Crossman & Sielcken, in liquidation, and from the defendant Irving Trust Company, as executor of the estate of Hermann Sielcken, his share of profits earned in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weitling v. SorensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API