Legal Opinion

Flatley Bros. v. Beauregard

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

A preliminary question of pleading is raised. Appellant contends that the court erred in determining that the contract was void under the statute of frauds because of the fact that this defense was not pleaded. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff “sold and delivered” the tile to the defendant. This allegation was met by a general denial. “There is much authority to the effect that when a contract pleaded is put in issue the plaintiff in order to recover must establish a valid agreement. The defendant is not called upon to anticipate that an invalid contract will be established and to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Langley v. SanbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Swanby v. Northern State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Kaufer v. StumpfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Purtell v. TehanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. National Steel Service Center, Inc. v. Wollin Silos & Equipment, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Holtan v. BjornsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API