Schmidt v. Reamann

LEVINE, Justice.

James Reamann appeals from an order denying his motion to reduce his monthly child support obligation. The district court found no material change of circumstances since the last modification hearing. We affirm.

In July 1987, the parties stipulated to James Reamann’s paternity of Diane Schmidt’s child and the district court ordered Reamann to pay $65.00 per month as child support. In September 1993, the Bismarck Regional Child Support Enforcement Unit [RCSEU] initiated a review of the 1987 support order under the then-applicable temporary section of NDCC ch. 14-09, requiring…