Legal Opinion
Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 6, 1986No. Civ. 4-85-1376PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to dismiss counterclaims brought by the defendants. Plaintiff’s motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
FACTS
Plaintiff Surgidev Corporation (Surgidev) is a California corporation with its principal place of business in Goleta, California and is engaged in the manufacture of artificial lenses. Defendant Eye Technology, Inc. (ETI) is a Delaware corporation headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota. Defendants Robert J. Fitzsimmons, Frederick G. Kalfon, James A. Greiling and Debra J. McCoy are former Surgidev…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mason v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Pinto v. Internationale Set, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Kellar v. VonHoltumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Salomon S.A. v. Alpina Sports Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1990
- Bond v. Cedar Rapids Television Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.