Legal Opinion

Chicago Art Co. v. Thacker

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1909PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Barbour County. Action by the Chicago Art Company against E. W. Thacker and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Poffenbarger Judge:

In an action of debt on a bond with collateral condition, brought by the Chicago Art Company, in the circuit court of Barbour county, against E. W. Thacker, J. D. Thacker, William J. Sipe and J. 0. Thacker, there was a verdict for the defendants, on which a judgment conforming thereto was rendered, and the plaintiff complains thereof on its writ of error.

The fecital in the condition of the bond adopted, by reference, a written'contract under seal between the plaintiff and E. W. Thacker by which he bound himself to deliver for it portraits, frames and other merchandise and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fox v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State v. CainWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Steed v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Davis v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Hamlin's Administrator v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1828

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Edward M. Rude Carrier Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Jackson v. JacksonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Durden v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. Polino v. KeckWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Thompson v. Turkey Gap Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API