Mantel v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
This conviction was for violating an ordinance of the city of Dallas prescribing a punishment for the exposure for sale and prohibiting the sale of unwholesome and adulterated food.
The complaint charges the adulteration of milk. The ordinance is very general, and reads as follows: “That no person, or persons, firm or corporation within the city of Dallas shall manufacture, offer or expose for sale or exchange or sell any article of food or drink which is adulterated or misbranded under the meaning of this act.” The punishment prescribed is not less than twenty-five…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte Coombs, Alias ShirleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Ex Parte FaggCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Lynn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- McLain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Ex Parte CrossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Murphy v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Ex Parte FarleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Ex Parte JonischkiesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Bennett v. Brown County Water Improvement District No. OneTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Bennett v. Brown County Water Improvement District No. OneTexas Supreme Court · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.