Legal Opinion

Sage v. Crosby

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a final order, in summary proceedings, of the Municipal Court of the city of Eew York, ninth district, borough of Manhattan.

1Per curiam

The Code provisions as to a dismissal, where title to real property is involved, relate exclusively to actions, not to proceedings, and such a defense does not oust a Municipal Court justice of jurisdiction in summary proceedings. Quinn v. Quinn, 46 App. Div. 241. The final order made below must, therefore, be reversed. Counsel for the appellants is mistaken in his contention that a counterclaim cannot be interposed by a tenant in a summary proceeding. While section 1359 of the Consolidation Act (Laws 1882, chap. 410) does not give such a right, yet section 2244 of the Code of Civil…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Quinn v. QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hett v. LangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Jefferson Real Estate Co. v. M. L. Hiller & SonsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1902
  3. Shotland v. MulliganAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
  4. Bennett v. Orange State Oil CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  5. Flegenheimer v. DreyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API