Legal Opinion
State v. Warbelton
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided February 20, 2008No. 2007AP105-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, EJ.
¶ 1. Should a jury be allowed to hear evidence that a defendant has stipulated to having a previous conviction for a violent crime and should it be instructed to make a finding on that matter when the defendant is on trial for a charge of stalking, "while having a previous conviction for a violent crime" (as defined in Wis. Stat. § 939.632(l)(e)l. (2001-02)) 1 in violation of Wis. Stat. § 940.32(2) and (2m)(a)? Under the facts of this case, the trial court answered "yes" to both questions. Jeffrey A. Warbelton contends that we should vacate all convictions before us because…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. PoellingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hegwood v. Town of Eagle Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
- State v. WarbeltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Johnson v. Mt. Morris Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- Stoker v. Milwaukee CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
- Bakkestuen v. Lepke Holdings LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.