Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pizzo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1992No. 93 E.D. Appeal Docket 1990PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

Appellant challenges the alibi instruction given to the jury at his aggravated assault trial, alleging that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the charge. Superior Court affirmed his judgment of sentence. 400 Pa.Super. 622, 576 A.2d 1137. We too affirm.

Appellant, Michael Pizzo, was convicted by a jury of simple assault, aggravated assault, and possession of an instrument of crime. Following the conviction, counsel filed post-trial motions. The motions were denied, and appellant received an aggregate sentence of eleven to twenty-two…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  4. Commonwealth v. NeelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. SaundersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. MontalvoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. FowlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API