Legal Opinion

Cole v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 2010No. ED 92649PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., Judge.

Introduction

Megal Cole (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Amended Motion under Rule 29.15 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing (Amended Motion).1 We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

A jury convicted Movant of one count of burglary in the first degree and one count of stealing a motor vehicle. Movant’s convictions were affirmed on appeal to this Court. State v. Cole, 238 S.W.3d 684 (Mo. App. E.D.2007). Movant timely filed his pro se Motion to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Bradley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. Kuhlenberg v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wooten v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API