Legal Opinion

Meyer v. General American Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1977No. 14805PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Chief Justice:

The Intervenor-Appellant (hereafter referred to as “McCurtain”) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff-Respondent (hereafter referred to as “Meyer”) wherein the trial court held that McCur-tain’s purchase of a D-9 caterpillar was a fraudulent sale within the meaning of the Utah Fraudulent Conveyance Act and, therefore, void. Briefly, the pertinent facts may be summarized as follows:

Meyer loaned $12,000 to General American Corporation (hereafter referred to as “GAC”) for the purpose of providing operating capital for their mining operation and to purchase a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. McGarry v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Utah Assets Corp. v. Dooley Bros. Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Ned J. Bowman Company v. WhiteUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  5. First Security Bank of Utah v. Vrontikis Bros., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 1987
  2. Baldwin v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. O'DEA v. OleaUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. First American Title Insurance Co. v. J.B. Ranch, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API