Legal Opinion
Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Ruschell
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1992No. 91-SC-494-DGPublished
1Opinion of the Court
834 S.W.2d 166 (1992)
OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Movant,
v.
Paula L. RUSCHELL, Respondent.
No. 91-SC-494-DG.
Supreme Court of Kentucky.
June 4, 1992.
Mark G. Arnzen, Mary K. Molloy, Covington, for movant.
Richard G. Meyer, Deters, Benzinger & Lavelle, PSC, Covington, for respondent.
LEIBSON, Justice.
This is an action filed by Paula L. Ruschell, the insured, seeking a declaratory judgment and damages against her insurer, Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, for no-fault benefits. The benefits are described in her policy as "Personal Injury Protection (PIP)" coverage, and conform to the statutory…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cingoranelli v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. IvieUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Crime Fighters Patrol v. HilesKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. RuschellKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Richardson v. Eastland, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.