Broderick Investment Co. v. Strand Nordstrom Stailey Parker, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge RULAND.
Plaintiff, Broderick Investment Company (BIC), appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, Strand Nord-strom Stailey Parker, Inc. (Strand). We affirm.
Strand was an independent insurance agency engaged to secure insurance for Ponderosa Timber Company. In 1984, BIC and Ponderosa entered into a contract for the purchase and removal of certain equipment from BIC’s wood treatment plant.
Pursuant to the contract, Ponderosa was obligated to provide and maintain comprehensive general liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 during the disassem-bly,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kiely v. St. GermainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Fischer v. KletzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Jefferson County School District R-1 v. Justus ex rel. JustusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- First National Bank in Lamar v. CollinsColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
- Taylor v. KinsellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Olson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Pinnacol Assurance v. HoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- West American Insurance v. Meridian Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Dunn v. American Family InsuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Struble v. American Family Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.