Legal Opinion

Harris v. Bell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 14, 1937No. 6 Div. 151PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Action of trespass on the case by appellee against appellant, Morris Cohn, and Roosevelt Reynolds for personal injuries received by the plaintiff in a collision between the automobile in which she was riding and the automobile of the appellant, Joe Harris, while being driven by said Reynolds. There was a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against Harris and Reynolds assessing the damages at $1,000 and acquitting Cohn. Harris alone appealed with citation to Reynolds to appear and join in the appeal and assignment of error, which he failed to do.

The* single question presented for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westchester Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Emison v. Wylam Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Kirk v. Showell, Fryer & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Osteen v. So. Car. Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  5. Gleason v. AmsdellNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jacobi v. Claude Nolan, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Sibley v. AdamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  3. Rhodes v. Roadway Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Daniel v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Davenport-Harris Funeral Home, Inc. v. ChandlerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API