Legal Opinion

Carrabine Construction Co. v. Chrysler Realty Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1986No. 85-1441PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The issue presented in this action is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Chrysler. For the reasons that follow, we hold that summary judgment was properly granted and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals on this issue.

Our analysis must begin by examining the procedural controversy surrounding this action. The controversy centers around the testimony of Norman Salem, zoning administrator for the city of Akron. Salem’s testimony was presented for the first time at the summary judgment hearing on March 29, 1983. That trial court heard…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Hospitality Motor Inns, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Nix, Inc. v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Burns Bros. Plumbers, Inc., and Cross-Appellant v. Groves Ventures Company and S. J. Groves & Sons Company, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  4. Gessler v. MadiganOhio Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Martin v. Central Ohio Transit AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Dugan & Meyers Construction Co. v. Ohio Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Daniel E. Terreri & Sons, Inc. v. Mahoning County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Colburn v. MaynardOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. DiGioia Bros. Excavating, Inc. v. Cleveland Department of Public UtilitiesOhio Court of Appeals · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API