Campbell v. Hospitality Motor Inns, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The question presented is whether the appellee corporation may be bound on a contract neither expressly authorized nor expressly ratified by its board of directors. The answer to this question turns on well-settled principles of the law of agency.
Directors and officers are agents of the corporation and can bind their principal, the corporation, by their acts. Kimball v. Kimball Bros., Inc. (1944), 143 Ohio St. 500 [28 O.O. 425]. In Kimball, supra, at 506-507, this court also stated that “* * * a corporation * * * may become bound by acquiescing in and ratifying an unauthorized act done on its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. First United Church of ChristOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
- Kimball v. Kimball Bros.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Piening v. Titus, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1960
- Johndahl v. Columbus Trotting Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Osborne v. LylesOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Lauren M. Pavlovich v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Stegawski v. Cleveland Anesthesia Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Allstate Financial Corp. v. Westfield Service Management Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.