Legal Opinion

United States v. Kung Chen Fur Corp.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 27, 1951No. 4640PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, C. D. 1203, 24 Cust.Ct. — , entered in conformity with the decision of the majority, Mollison, J. dissenting, sustaining importer’s protests claiming free entry for plates of kid skins imported from China and entered, under the Tariff Act of 1930, at the port of New York in February 1935.

Two protests, Nos. 811174-G and 909743-G, are involved. The merchandise being similar and the protests substantially identical, the cases were consolidated for trial and disposed of by the 'Customs…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wisconsin RR Comm. v. C., B. & QRR CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Railroad Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Aldridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. Guthman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Virginia J. March v. United States of America. Virginia J. March v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  2. Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  3. Potomac Passengers Ass'n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. SilvermanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1955
  5. South Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API