Legal Opinion

Ralston v. Skerrett

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1891No. 6965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

A re-examination of this case satisfies this court that the disposition heretofore made of it on the report of the Commission of Appeals was erroneous, and the motion for rehearing will be sustained.

The action was brought by the heirs of M. B. Skerrett to recover 1209i acres of land patented to Thomas Price on November 6, 1874, and appellants other than Mrs. Balston claim through regular chain of title from the patentee.

There is no statement of facts, but from the conclusions of fact found by the court it appears that M. B. Skerrett'was a volunteer soldier in the army…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bates v. BaconTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hines v. ThornTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Todd v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Causici v. La CosteTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Blum v. LooneyTexas Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Houston Oil Co. v. GallupCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Russell v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API