Legal Opinion

Burr v. Phares

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1917PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Randolph County. Bastardy proceeding by Elsie Burr against Burl Phares. Verdict of guilty was set aside and a new trial awarded, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

■Milijsr, Judge:

In a- bastardy proceeding begun pursuant to chapter 80, of the Code, defendant pleaded not guilty, and also that before the commencement of said proceeding he had paid the plaintiff twenty five dollars and other considerations, which she accepted “in full- satisfaction and discharge of said action. ’ ’

On the trial plaintiff proved, and defendant did not deny, that he was the father of the bastard child. So that the only *161issue upon which the defendant relied was that raised by his plea of satisfaction and discharge for the consideration alleged.

To sustain this plea defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Billingsley v. ClellandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Black Hawk County v. CotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  3. Bratt v. CornwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Ingwaldson v. SkrivsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Humphrey v. KassonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Roselawn Memorial Gardens, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Mildred L.M. v. John O.F.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Shelby J.S. v. George L.H.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Olliff v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API