Legal Opinion
Geiger v. Creative Impact Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 17, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01443Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Brenda Geiger, et al., No. CV-18-01443-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Creative Impact Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court are the parties’ Daubert motions to exclude certain 16 expert witnesses. (Doc. 66; Doc. 69; Doc. 70). The Court now rules.1 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 Plaintiffs Brenda Geiger, CJ Gibson, Jessa Hinton, Jessica Killings, and Rosa 19 Acosta assert three claims against Defendant Creative Impact Incorporated: (1) false light 20 invasion of privacy under Arizona law, (2)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bazemore v. FridaySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- William Partridge James Zagorski William Stojack v. Robert B. Reich Helen Haase U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Geraldine McCULLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. H.B. FULLER COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.