Legal Opinion

People v. Rohrs

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, New York county; Beach, Justice. The people of the state of Hew Tork sued Charles H. Rohrs and George Boldt to recover penalties for violation of Laws 1885, e. 183, §§ 7, 8, under section 19, to prevent deception in dairy products. Verdict for plaintiff by order of the court, and judgment on the verdict. Defendants appeal.

1Per curiam

The defendants in this action were sued to recover penalties under the act of 1885 entitled “An act to prevent deception in the sale of dairy products. ” The act provided that whoever violated its provisions should be guilty of a misdemeanor, and be punished by fine or imprisonment, and, in addition, should forfeit and pay a fixed penalty of $500. The defendants offered to prove that the defendant Rohrs had been tried for the offenses charged in the complaint in the court of special sessions, and acquitted. This offer was rejected, and exception taken. The parties to the criminal proceeding…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. CarlisiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940
  2. In re the Accounting of StanleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
  3. People v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. Green v. AltenkirchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API