Legal Opinion

Babcock v. Berlin

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lester E. Gerard, J.

Motion is granted.

This motion by defendant Georgina Berlin seeks summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 dismissing the complaint and declaring the subject mortgage void for usury.

The plaintiffs commenced an action wherein they sought a judgment reforming a certain contract by changing the interest rate from 18%% to 16% per annum, the latter figure representing the legal permissible rate of interest at the time of the execution of the subject bond and mortgage. Defendant Berlin counterclaimed in her answer for a judgment declaring the mortgage null and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fiedler v. . DarrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. In re the Estate of DaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Hammond v. MarranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Angelo v. BrennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. DeSimon v. Ogden AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Olsen v. PorterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re General American Communications Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API