Legal Opinion

State Farm Mut. Automobile Insurance v. Brooks

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided March 6, 1942No. 146PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment authorized by section 400, Title 28 U.S.C. A. The plaintiff seeks a declaration of rights and obligations under a policy of liability insurance issued by it to the defendant A. F. Brooks. Such declaration is sought upon a state of facts arising while its policy was in force. The effective date of the policy was October 11, 1940, and it admittedly was in force at the date of the occurrence which laid the foundation for this suit. Its policyholder, A. F. Brooks, was doing business as East Side Ice & Fuel Company, 1101 Broadway,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railroad v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Green v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Frick Co. v. Norfolk & O. V. R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1898
  4. Carrigan v. Western Radio Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Eisen, Admr. v. John Hancock Mut. L. Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  3. Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Standard Accident Ins. Co. of Detroit v. HullDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1950
  5. Carter v. Virginia Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API