Legal Opinion

Martin v. Thor Motor Coach Inc

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided July 23, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00013Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION CLARENCE MARTIN et al., Plaintiffs, v. CAUSE NO. 3:20-CV-13 DRL-MGG THOR MOTOR COACH INC., Defendant. OPINION & ORDER Clarence and Terri Martin purchased a recreational vehicle manufactured by Thor Motor Coach, Inc., which they claim is a dud. After months of attempts to fix various defects, the Martins filed this action alleging Thor breached its express and implied warranties. Thor believes the Martins waited too long to file this action and asks the court to dismiss the case. The court agrees with Thor only in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Kendale L. Adams v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Geinosky v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API