Legal Opinion

Dodson v. Phagan

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1971No. 26294PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The question here is whether parol evidence was admissible to show that the consideration of a deed, recited to be for natural love and affection, was the grantee’s promise to pay certain expenses of the grantor and his wife.

This question arose from an action filed in the Superior Court of Sumter County by the grantor in the deed, H. T. Phagan, against the grantee, Annie Mae Dodson and another party subsequently eliminated, seeking thereafter only recovery of damages for breach of her alleged promise to pay the expenses of his wife’s last illness and burial and of a cemetery monument for her.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stonecypher v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Cottle v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Awtrey v. AwtreySupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  4. Farrar Lumber Co. v. BrindleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  5. Thompson v. CodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wall v. Federal Land BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Zorn v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Head v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  4. Southeast Timberlands, Inc. v. Haiseal Timber, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Carolyn Ann Lewis v. Paul B. IknerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API