Chicago Web Printing Pressmen's Union No. 7 v. Chicago Tribune
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LEIGHTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs Chicago Web Printing Pressmen’s Union Number 7 and Chicago Mailers’ Union No. 2 have filed this complaint against defendant the Chicago Tribune under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) seeking an order directing defendant to submit certain grievances to arbitration in accordance with the terms of certain collective bargaining agreements. Defendant now moves to dismiss, contending the disputes are not arbitrable and plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The following…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dominic Niro v. Fearn International, Inc., and Beer, Soft Drink, Water, Etc., Local Union 744, I.B.T.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United Food & Commercial Workers Local 100a, Afl-Cio & Clc v. John Hofmeister and Son, Incorporated, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- International Union, United Automobile Workers v. Young Radiator Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- International Union, United Automobile And Aerospace And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America (Uaw) v. Young Radiator CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990