R.S. Mutter, Warden v. Bobby Ross
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice Ketchum :
The West Virginia Parole Board ("the Board") revoked Bobby Ross's parole based, in part, on him violating a condition of parole prohibiting him from possessing or having contact with a computer or other device with *868 internet access. We are asked whether this condition of parole is constitutional under the First Amendment.
In 2017, the United States Supreme Court held in Packingham v. North Carolina 2 that a state statute barring registered sex offenders from accessing social media networking websites was an overbroad restriction of the right to free speech in violation of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Appalachian Power Co. v. State Tax DepartmentWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. EpperlyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
- Packingham v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- McCullen v. CoakleySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Conner v. GriffithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kenneth Lee Doss v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
- Kenneth Lee Doss v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021