Legal Opinion

Packingham v. North Carolina

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 19, 2017No. 15–1194PublishedCited by 321 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

In 2008, North Carolina enacted a statute making it a felony for a registered sex offender to gain access to a number of websites, including commonplace social media websites like Facebook and Twitter. The question presented is whether that law is permissible under the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause, applicable to the States under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

I

A

North Carolina law makes it a felony for a registered sex offender "to access a commercial social networking Web site where the sex offender knows that the site permits minor children to become members or to…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by321 opinions

  1. Timbs v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Brian Davison v. Phyllis RandallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. Counterman v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  4. Valenti v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Moody v. NetChoice, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2024

316 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API