Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Umphenour
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action for killing domestic animals. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion County; the Hon. Edward P. Vail, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1895.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The question here is whether the railroad company was required to maintain a fence at the point where the plaintiff’s horses came upon the track. According to the proof the railroad runs along the south side of an unincorporated village. The depot building, water tank, stock pens, grain elevators and switches are all situated within a space that is unfenced. According to the uncontradicted proof so much of that space as lies between G-riggs street and Main street extended across the railroad, which includes the place where the animals came on the track, is necessarily required for the…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HansIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. WillisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. GuertinIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. FranklinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
4Cited by3 opinions
- Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. GreenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
- Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. CapootAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
- Enright v. Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910