Legal Opinion
Daughtry v. Birdsong Peanuts
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided September 7, 2001No. Civ.A. 01-D-704-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DE MENT, District Judge.
Before the court is the Motion To Remand (“Motion”) filed on July 13, 2001 by Ralph Michael Daughtry, individually and as Executor of the Estate of David W. Daughtry, deceased; Kenneth Dale Daughtry; and David Scott Daughtry (collectively “Plaintiffs”). After careful consideration of the arguments of the parties, the relevant law, and the record as a whole, the court finds that Plaintiffs’ Motion To Remand is due to be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs originally filed their Complaint and First Amended Complaint in the Circuit Court of Dale…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adair v. JohnstonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
- Lawrence v. NationDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
- Mullins v. Securian Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021