Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Winkles

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 18, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Action foi breach of warranty. Before Judge Edwards. Haralson superior court. January 18, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtEish, C. J.

1. In an action on a general warranty of title to land against the claims of all persons, an eviction or equivalent disturbance by an outstanding paramount title must be shown, to entitle the plaintiff to recover. Darley v. Mallary, 136 Ga. 345 (71 S. E. 471).

2. If in such a case the plaintiff relies upon ouster in consequence of legal proceedings, it must appear that the warrantor had notice thereof and an opportunity to defend. Civil Code, § 4197. See Clements v. Collins, 59 Ga. 124; Haines v. Fort, 93 Ga. 25, 28 (18 S. E. 994).

3. The defendant in execution is not a party to a statutory…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clements v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  2. Central Bank v. Georgia Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Haines v. FortSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Cooper v. YearwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Anderson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Mutual Insurance v. McJenkin Insurance & Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. Abernathy v. RyleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Mizell v. SchubertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Nix v. Citizens BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. First National Bank v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API