Legal Opinion

Nix v. Citizens Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1925No. 16347PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. In order to give a court jurisdiction of an attachment, there must be a sufficient affidavit, a levy and seizure of the property, and a proper entry of the levy and seizure. Albright-Pryor Co. v. Pacific Selling Co., 126 Ga. 498 (55 S. E. 251, 115 Am. St. Rep. 108) ; Tuells v. Torras, 113 Ga. 691 (4) (39 S. E. 455) ; New England Mortgage &c. Co. v. Watson, 99 Ga. 733 (2) (27 S. E. 160).

2. In order to support the jurisdiction of a court as to a purchase-money attachment, -the affidavit must describe the property in such way as to .indicate what property is to be levied upon. In the instant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tuells v. TorrasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Albright-Pryor Co. v. Pacific Selling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. New England Mortgage Security Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Brooks v. WinklesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Sharp v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Worley Bros. Granite Co. v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Walden v. BarwickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  3. Sheffield v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API