Richard L. Meadows v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge:
This proceeding is brought as an appeal, though the definite judgment from which it is taken is not clearly set out. Insofar as it asserts that the district court acted outside its authority, its assertions are more appropriate to a petition for the writ of mandamus. It being our judgment that the district court did act within the authority conferred upon it by the Congress, and that we are precluded from reviewing its actions, the proceeding is dismissed, whether taken as an appeal or construed as a petition for mandamus relief.
A
Appellant and another were…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Leroy Doyle, Dennis P. Coffey and Coffey & CoffeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
3Cited by15 opinions
- Susie Schuster, A/K/A Susie Schuster Translateur v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Donald E. Hiley and Ruth v. Hiley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Stebco Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Harry E. Hall v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service (Department of Treasury)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Granse v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.