Alfonso v. Diamondhead Fire Protection District
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Chief Justice,
for the Court:
¶ 1. A group of property owners filed suit against the Diamondhead Fire Protection District (DFPD) board of commissioners and several current and former DFPD officers, seeking declaratory judgment that a fee charged for fire-protection services is an impermissible tax. Finding the DFPD had authority to charge fees for services rendered, the trial court entered a judgment in favor of the DFPD. The property owners appeal, raising two issues: (1) whether the monthly fee is an illegal tax, and (2) whether the power to tax should be construed narrowly. We find…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- King County Fire Protection District No. 16 v. Housing AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Tunica County v. Hampton Co. National Surety, LLCMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- City of River Falls v. St. Bridget's Catholic ChurchCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rex Distributing Company, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, LLCMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
- Rex Distributing Company, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, LLCMississippi Supreme Court · 2019