Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Briggs

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1974No. 7426DC256PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

Defendant contends the trial court erred in failing to make sufficient findings of fact to support an order for alimony pendente lite. G.S. 50-16.8 (f) provides, among other things, that when an application for alimony pendente lite is made, the trial judge shall find the facts from the evidence presented. The trial judge is not required to make findings as to each allegation and evidentiary fact presented. However, the trial judge is required to make such findings which, upon appellate review, will support his award of alimony pendente lite.

The trial judge in this case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Presson v. PressonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Vandiver v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Blair v. BlairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Watts v. WattsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Eudy v. EudyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API