Legal Opinion

Morearty v. City of McCook

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1928No. 25952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff, also appellant, from a judgment against him rendered at the close of his testimony, on the motion of appellee, also defendant, dismissing plaintiff’s petition and cause of action.

It is expedient to fix in mind the precise issues involved. Plaintiff’s petition alleged: The plaintiff was employed as “consulting engineer” to assist in constructing all pavements and sewers in McCook to be let within one year from June 27, 1925. On that date plaintiff signed a written contract relating to that work, and delivered it to the defendant. About April 9, 1926, defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Koch v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Library Board v. OhlsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  3. MacLeod v. City of WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Craig v. WeitnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Standard Bridge Co. v. Kearney CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'Neal v. First Trust Company of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Cartwright & Wilson Construction Co. v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Morearty v. City of McCookNebraska Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API