Legal Opinion

Library Board v. Ohlsen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1923No. 22323PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Begley, District Judge.

This is an action brought by plaintiff to recover damages claimed because of the failure of defendants to properly construct a certain library building in Arcadia, Nebraska, in accordance with the contract and plans and specifications. Plaintiff recovered a verdict 'by jury, and from the judgment thereon defendants have appealed.

Plaintiff contended that the building was not constructed according to plans and specifications, nor in a workmanlike manner, in that the roof and gutters were not water-tight and the walls, cornices, windows and doors were improperly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. KrayenbuhlNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  2. North Chicago Street Railroad v. FitzgibbonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Hatcher v. Quincy Horse Railway & Carrying Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  4. Moore v. Aurora, Elgin & Chicago RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  5. C. T. Fitts & Co. v. ReinhartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Jackson Bros.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Murray Ex Rel. Murray v. Pearson Appliance StoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Jones v. ElliottNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Karlinski v. P. R. & H. Lumber & Construction Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Cartwright & Wilson Construction Co. v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API