Todd Maroney v. University Interscholastic League
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
We are again confronted with a high school sportsman’s civil rights 1 challenge to the authority of the University Interscholastic League (UIL) to determine his eligibility. Originally filed in state court, Todd Maroney’s challenge of the UIL’s “Five-Year Rule,” 2 on state and federal constitutional grounds, was removed to federal court by the UIL. Because Maroney’s action did not raise a substantial federal claim, we hold that removal jurisdiction never attached in the district court.
I
Maroney, an eighteen-year-old student at Westlake High School in Austin, Texas, sought to play varsity…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Conway v. KingDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1989
- Amoco Chemical Co. v. Tex Tin Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Yeo, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Sims v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1992
- Buerger v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.